 Peter Khill not guilty in shotgun shooting of unarmed Indigenous man Jon StyresLaw & Order | 208048 hits | Jun 27 7:15 am | Posted by: DrCaleb  Khill admitted he fired the two, close-range shotgun blasts that killed the 29-year-old man from Oshweken, Ont., on the night of Feb. 4, 2016 but maintained he acted in self-defence.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
A rational outcome? Yes. An unfortunate outcome? Yes. Good? I don't know.
I hesitate to call it a good outcome.
A rational outcome? Yes. An unfortunate outcome? Yes. Good? I don't know.
Let's look at the defense argument:
Seems to me that if Khill was a cop then this defense would be enough to clear him and there'd be near universal head nodding in support.
So if this argument works for the cops then it's also applicable to normal people.
The decision also puts criminals on notice that the government won't be protecting them from law abiding citizens anymore.
This is a win for all involved.
The decision also puts criminals on notice that the government won't be protecting them from law abiding citizens anymore.
This is a win for all involved.
That's the kicker for me. Come to my place and pilfer my stuff; make sure your next of kin knows you might not be coming back.
The decision also puts criminals on notice that the government won't be protecting them from law abiding citizens anymore.
This is a win for all involved.
That's the kicker for me. Come to my place and pilfer my stuff; make sure your next of kin knows you might not be coming back.
Good point...this is also a sideways win for property rights.