A new poll completed by Nanos Research indicates that Stephen Harper has widened his leadership index score advantage over Michael Ignatieff. Harper leads in all regions except Quebec where Ignatieff fares better than Harper on the Leadership Index.
"poquas" said It�s as relevant as who has the nicest hair.
Well you can keep telling yourself that if you like, but the voters perception on the leadership quality of the main runners has everything to do with how they'll vote. Remember that an incumbant usually has the advantage so that's also something the other parties have to get around.
OH PLEASE!!! Judging by the Nanos Research I find their results dubious most times. I don't know how they gather their results but they are often off the mark. I don't understand why anybody uses them as an accurate source anymore.
OH PLEASE!!! Judging by the Nanos Research I find their results dubious most times. I don't know how they gather their results but they are often off the mark.
Can you name one of those times? An example? this is how htey scored the last election:
"BluesBud" said OH PLEASE!!! Judging by the Nanos Research I find their results dubious most times. I don't know how they gather their results but they are often off the mark. I don't understand why anybody uses them as an accurate source anymore.
TRANSLATION = I don't like the results so I'm going to disregard it as BS.
"OnTheIce" said Considering a "Leadership Poll" has no bearing on the national voting do you really think this is important?
Don't pretend to be obtuse.
Stephane Dion got slaughtered because he and the Liberals were seen as weak and lacking leadership.
Poquas has accidently demostrated a core Liberal belief, vote for the party and ideals, leader is never important. Basically a pig in a red sweather would be vote worthy. Were as for conservatives vote for the ideals and the leader is just as important factor to consider when voting.
I knew you were never a Conservative all along Poq, busted.
Considering a "Leadership Poll" has no bearing on the national voting do you really think this is important?
You really believe that?
Considering a "Leadership Poll" has no bearing on the national voting do you really think this is important?
Don't pretend to be obtuse.
Stephane Dion got slaughtered because he and the Liberals were seen as weak and lacking leadership.
It�s as relevant as who has the nicest hair.
Well you can keep telling yourself that if you like, but the voters perception on the leadership quality of the main runners has everything to do with how they'll vote. Remember that an incumbant usually has the advantage so that's also something the other parties have to get around.
Can you name one of those times? An example? this is how htey scored the last election:
Party............prediction, Election Results
Conservative.....38.4%........36.3%
Liberal..........30.1%........30.2%
NDP..............17.4%........17.5%
Bloc Quebecois...10.6%........10.5%
Green / Other....5.6%.........5.5%
looks pretty good to me.
OH PLEASE!!! Judging by the Nanos Research I find their results dubious most times. I don't know how they gather their results but they are often off the mark. I don't understand why anybody uses them as an accurate source anymore.
TRANSLATION = I don't like the results so I'm going to disregard it as BS.
Considering a "Leadership Poll" has no bearing on the national voting do you really think this is important?
Don't pretend to be obtuse.
Stephane Dion got slaughtered because he and the Liberals were seen as weak and lacking leadership.
Poquas has accidently demostrated a core Liberal belief, vote for the party and ideals, leader is never important. Basically a pig in a red sweather would be vote worthy. Were as for conservatives vote for the ideals and the leader is just as important factor to consider when voting.
I knew you were never a Conservative all along Poq, busted.