The federal government does not need higher taxes to grapple with the burgeoning federal deficit caused by the recession, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Friday.
I dont believe anyone who makes that claim because I know it wont be possible unless resource prices goes through the roof then maybe....and all Libs will vote for the CPC in the next election /sarcasm
Read the comments by the morons who are now not saying word one about Harper claiming the same thing. For that matter where were you? You seem to jump in loads of times on political threads to question me so why are you not aware of this?
Are we then to assume that Harper has a magic wand (the wand the con pundits said Iggy must have) to use to eliminate his own deficit?
Oh? Where are the cons screaming about this?
No need, he didn't say that he would neither raise taxes or limit spendings, which is what Iggy said.
"Disciplined spendings" means that he will cut in many things, which is possible and doesn't involve money appearing from thin air.
Oh? Where are the cons screaming about this?
What's there to scream about? The deficit? I'm not sure what you're getting at.
Oh? Where are the cons screaming about this?
What's there to scream about? The deficit? I'm not sure what you're getting at.
The fact that when Iggy claimed he would eliminate the deficit without tax increases the outcry from the con core was extremely loud and shrill.
In fact its right here: current-events-f59/ignatieff-vows-to-erase-50b-deficit-with-no-new-taxes-mer-t83378.html
Read the comments by the morons who are now not saying word one about Harper claiming the same thing. For that matter where were you? You seem to jump in loads of times on political threads to question me so why are you not aware of this?
Are we then to assume that Harper has a magic wand (the wand the con pundits said Iggy must have) to use to eliminate his own deficit?
Usually a cut in services, maintenance, etc.